Metallic powders have been consistently used in powder metallurgy (PM), 3D-printing, solder for printed circuit boards, and other industries. The composition and particle size of these powders is critical for their processability and end use application. Uniform particle size facilitates homogenous melting, good interlayer bonding, improved mechanical properties and enhanced surface finish. Ebatco’s NAT Lab has a Beckman Coulter LS 13 320 Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer and a Beckman Coulter Multisizer 4 which can measure particle concentration and size distribution respectively. Our SEM/EDS capabilities also allows us to analyze the microstructure and morphology of metallic powders. Lastly, we can use our STA 449 F3 Jupiter Thermal Analyzer to determine phase transformations that can occur within these metallic powders up to 1650 ºC.
Typical Experimental Results
SEM images of a fine gold powder.
Applications
3D Printing | Agglomerates | Aggregates | Alloys | Crystal Structures |
Element Distribution | Failure Analysis | Foreign Material Identification | Forensic Analysis | Fractography |
Fracture Study | Grains | Grain Boundaries | Grain Growth | Grain Orientation |
Grain Size | Grain Structure | IC Failure Analysis | Materials | Metals |
Metallography | Microscopy | Microstructure | Particle Distribution | Particle Size |
Phase Diagram | Powder Flow | Powder Metallurgy | Selective Laser Sintering | Surface Finish |
For more information please read our application notes:
Microporosity Measurement of Zn-Al Casting by Quantitative Image Analysis, PDF
Instruments: Beckman Coulter LS 13 320 Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer with ULM and Sonication Control Unit connected
Key Specifications:
Filament | W hairpin filament |
Resolution | High Vacuum: 3nm (30kV), 8nm (3kV), 15nm (1kV) Low Vacuum: 4 nm (30kV) |
Accelerating Voltage | 300 V to 30 kV |
Magnification | 5x to 300,000x |
LV Detector | Multi-segment BSED |
LV Pressure | 10 to 270 Pa |
Sample Sizes | Height: 80mm; Width: 178 mm |
Stage | Eucentric 5 axis motor control, asynchronous movement, x-y: 125mm-110mm, z: 5mm-8mm, tilt:-10 to 90 degrees, rotation: 360 degrees |
Resolution | 5120 x 3840 pixels |
Condenser Lens | Zoom condenser lens |
Objective Lens | Conical objective lens |
Microporosity Measurement of Zn-Al Casting by Quantitative Image Analysis
With the development of computer technology, quantitative software image analysis has become feasible. Computer software can count grain and particle size, identify nonmetallic inclusions, and calculate porosity more efficiently than traditional manual methods. In this app note, the micro porosity of a Zn-Al casting is measured to demonstrate how the quantitative image analysis works.
Figure 1. Typical microstructure of the Zn-Al alloy
Figure 1 shows the typical microstructure of a Zn-Al alloy. The alloy is composed of a lamellar eutectic α phase (dendrite network) and a zinc-rich η phase. In cast zinc, Al can refine the grain size and form a fine equiaxed grain structure. This can improve the strength, ductility, and toughness of zinc castings. Tiny holes form between the arms of the dendritic network due to gas evolution during the solidification process. In this sample, the relatively large pores are shrinkage cavities, which are more or less fissured and cave like in shape. It is impossible to completely remove shrinkage cavities in Zn-Al castings.
In this work, pores larger than 5 µm were selected for porosity measurement. Based upon practical applications or customer requirements, different pore sizes can be selected to calculate the porosity of the casting. To determine the effects of image magnification on porosity measurement, 200X and 500X micrographs are compared. For each magnification, five random areas were selected to measure the porosity of the casting. Figure 2 shows a typical distribution of pores within the Zn-Al casting.
Figure 2. Typical porosity measurement results using 200X (left) and 500X (right) magnification. (Pore sizes less than 5 µm were excluded from statistical calculations.)
Table 1 lists the porosity measurements with 200X and 500X magnifications. Based upon the results of the image analysis software, the average pore areas measured at 200X and 500X magnifications were very similar, around 19.74 µm2. The porosities (or percentage of the total image area occupied by pores) were consistent when measured at 200X and 500X magnification.
Table 1. Porosity measurement results with different magnifications
200X Magnification 500X Magnification area Average size (µm2) Percent area (%) Average size (µm2) Percent area (%) area 1 19.80 0.98 17.91 1.38 area 2 18.76 1.13 21.42 1.36 area 3 23.95 1.37 24.72 0.97 area 4 18.78 0.92 20.65 1.15 area 5 17.51 0.75 13.93 0.86 average 19.76 1.03 19.72 1.15
ASTM Number | Title | Website Link |
A892 – 06 | Standard Guide for Defining and Rating the Microstructure of High Carbon Bearing Steels | Link |
B276 – 05(2015) | Standard Test Method for Apparent Porosity in Cemented Carbides | Link |
B487 – 85(2013) | Standard Test Method for Measurement of Metal and Oxide Coating Thickness by Microscopical Examination of Cross Section | Link |
B578 – 87(2015) | Standard Test Method for Microhardness of Electroplated Coatings | Link |
B657 – 05 | Guide for Metallographic Identification of Microstructure in Cemented Carbides | Link |
B748 – 90(2016) | Standard Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Metallic Coatings by Measurement of Cross Section with a Scanning Electron Microscope | Link |
B796 – 02 | Standard Test Method for Nonmetallic Inclusion Content of Powders Intended for Powder Forging (P/F) Applications | Link |
E1508 – 98(2008) | Standard Guide for Quantitative Analysis by Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy | Link |
E2651 – 10 | Standard Guide for Powder Particle Size Analysis | Link |
E3 – 01(2007)e1 | Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens | Link |
E384 – 09 | Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials | Link |
E384 – 10e2 | Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials | Link |
E407 – 07(2015)e1 | Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys | Link |
E45 – 05e3 | Standard Test Methods for Determining the Inclusion Content of Steel | Link |
E562 – 11 | Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count | Link |
E768 – 99(2010)e1 | Standard Guide for Preparing and Evaluating Specimens for Automatic Inclusion Assessment of Steel | Link |
E930 – 99(2015) | Standard Test Methods for Estimating the Largest Grain Observed in a Metallographic Section (ALA Grain Size) | Link |
ISO Number | Title | Link |
9220:1988 | Metallic coatings — Measurement of coating thickness — Scanning electron microscope method | Link |
643:2012 | Steels — Micrographic determination of the apparent grain size | Link |
5949:1983 | Tool steels and bearing steels — Micrographic method for assessing the distribution of carbides using reference photomicrographs | Link |
4499-4:2016 | Hardmetals — Metallographic determination of microstructure — Part 4: Characterisation of porosity, carbon defects and eta-phase content | Link |
4499-1:2008 | Hardmetals — Metallographic determination of microstructure — Part 1: Photomicrographs and description | Link |
18203:2016 | Steel — Determination of the thickness of surface-hardened layers | Link |